Comparison

KYA vs Auth0 for AI Agents — Why Traditional IAM Falls Short

Auth0 was designed for human logins. AI agents need a different model: per-action verification, short-lived capability tokens, and tamper-proof audit logs. Here's a detailed comparison.

The fundamental difference

Auth0 and Okta are session-based: a human authenticates once, gets a token valid for hours. AI agents don't log in — they spawn, execute actions at machine speed, and terminate. The session model doesn't apply.

Feature comparison

KYA is purpose-built for the agentic model: per-action verification, short-lived capability tokens (5-minute TTL), and a hash-chained audit log designed for machine-speed workloads.

FeatureKYAAlternative
Identity modelEd25519 keypair per agentUser account / service account
Token lifetime5–30 minutes (capability token)Hours / days (session JWT)
Permission scopePer action (tool + spend + rate)Per role (RBAC)
VerificationPre-execution gate (ALLOW/DENY)Post-authentication only
Audit logHash-chain, tamper-evident, every actionLogin events only
RevocationSeconds, per-capabilitySession invalidation
Latency targetp99 < 20msNot designed for agent workloads
Open sourceYes (Apache 2.0)No

When to use Auth0 vs KYA

Auth0 is the right choice for human authentication flows: login, SSO, MFA. KYA is the right choice when an autonomous AI agent needs to perform actions on production systems. The two are complementary: use Auth0 to authenticate your users, use KYA to control what your agents can do.

Getting started with KYA

KYA can be integrated in under 5 minutes with a single function call around your tool execution. The SDK is available for Python and JavaScript/TypeScript.

Try KYA for free

Add identity & permissions to your AI agents in under 5 minutes.